The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has revealed details of items it says were recovered from the Abuja home of former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, during a search last month.
The anti-graft agency filed the details before the Federal Capital Territory High Court as it opposed a N1bn fundamental rights suit brought by the former governor. El-Rufai is challenging what he calls his illegal arrest, detention and the search of his residence.
In court papers, the ICPC said its officers acted under a valid search warrant issued on 18 February and executed the following day at 12 Mambilla Street, Asokoro, Abuja. The commission said the operation ran from 1:37pm to 3:56pm and was carried out with officers of the Nigeria Police Force present.
According to the filings, the search was witnessed by El-Rufai’s wife, Hadiza El-Rufai, and his son, Mohammed El-Rufai.
The commission listed investor account statements, asset declaration forms, company registration papers, corporate compliance records and client Know-Your-Customer files among the documents recovered. It also cited records of domestic and foreign loans approved by the Kaduna State House of Assembly between 2015 and 2023, share certificates in Ecobank Nigeria Plc, land documents, valuation reports, deeds of assignment and Powers of Attorney for several properties.
Electronic items allegedly seized include nine flash drives, one memory card, seven hard drives, multiple laptops such as Apple MacBook Pro and Elumac Book Pro models, several mobile phones, 18 other devices and a Remarkable tablet. The ICPC said all items were sealed for forensic analysis and documented in a detailed device form.
The commission noted that El-Rufai stated he did not grant consent for access to the devices.
In response, his family accused the ICPC of trying to criminalise his silence during interrogation. In a statement signed by his son, Bello El-Rufai, a member of the House of Representatives, the former governor urged the agency to file charges if it had evidence.
The family also disputed the scope of items taken and said only personal effects were seized. They argued that the search warrant was invalid and have challenged it in court.
The ICPC maintains its actions were lawful and part of ongoing investigations into alleged corruption and asset concealment.